Showing posts with label Instrumentalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Instrumentalism. Show all posts

Tuesday, 9 August 2016

The Thoughts Of Dewey Through Systemic Functional Linguistics

Russell (1961: 775):
From a strictly philosophical point of view, the chief importance of Dewey's work lies in his criticism of the traditional notion of 'truth', which is embodied in the theory that he calls 'instrumentalism'.  Truth, as conceived by most professional philosophers, is static and final, perfect and eternal; … Dewey's interests are biological … he conceives thought as an evolutionary process.  The traditional view would, of course, admit that men gradually come to know more, but each piece of knowledge, when achieved, is regarded as something final.

Blogger Comment:

From the perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistic theory, meaning evolves in context, and what meaning affords the species has the potential to change the contexts in which it evolves.  Like biological evolution, the evolution of meaning is potentially unending, and it involves the fitting of the system to the environment in which it functions.

Sunday, 31 July 2016

The Thoughts Of Marx In Systemic Functional Linguistics [1]

Russell (1960: 749):
[Marx] called himself a materialist, but not of the eighteenth century sort.  His sort, which, under Hegelian influence, he called 'dialectical', differed in an important way from traditional materialism, and was more akin to what is now called instrumentalism. The older materialism, he said, mistakenly regarded sensation as passive, and thus attributed activity primarily to the object.  In Marx's view, all sensation or perception is an interaction between subject and object; the bare object, apart from the activity of the percipient, is a mere raw material, which is transformed in the process of becoming known.  Knowledge in the old sense of passive contemplation is an unreal abstraction; the process that really takes place is one of handling things.

Blogger Comments:

Marx's 'activity' interpretation of perception, as the interaction of subject and object, has been imported into Systemic Functional Linguistic theory as the view that the impact of the environment is (actively) construed as meaning — an epistemological view that also follows from the theory of experience embodied in the grammatics.

The 'activity' interpretation of perceptual categorisation can also be seen in neuroscience, in Gerald Edelman's Theory of Neuronal Group Selection.  Here the impact of the environment on sensory detectors selects some active neuronal groups over others, differentially probabilised by the activity of inherited 'value' systems, with different impacts selecting different groups, resulting in different categorisations of perceptual experience.  Presumably the intellectual source, in this case, is the pragmatism of William James and John Dewey, rather than the dialectical materialism of Marx.