The Gospel of John (1:1):
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Blogger Comments:
From the perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistic theory, this symbolism from Abrahamic mythology can be interpreted as construing the genesis of language, as meaning potential, and if it is language that primarily distinguishes humans from other apes, as construing the genesis of humanity itself.
The first clause construes time beginning with the existence of the Word (Greek logos 'word', 'speech', 'discourse'); that is, with the existence of language:
in the beginning
|
was
|
the Word
|
Location: time
|
Process: existential
|
Existent
|
The second clause extends this by construing God (creator) as an Attribute of language:
and
|
the Word
|
was
|
with God
|
Carrier
|
Process: attributive
|
Attribute:
accompaniment
|
And the third clause extends this by construing the identity of language and its creator:
and
|
the Word
|
was
|
God
|
Identifier Token
|
Process: identifying
|
Identified Value
|
in which the creator of meaning is encoded by reference to the meaning created, and/or:
in which the meaning created is decoded by reference to the creator of meaning.
If, on the other hand, the clause is interpreted as receptive, rather than operative, then either:
and
|
the Word
|
was
|
God
|
Identified Token
|
Process: identifying
|
Identifier Value
|
in which the meaning created is decoded by reference to the creator of meaning.
If, on the other hand, the clause is interpreted as receptive, rather than operative, then either:
and
|
the Word
|
was
|
God
|
Identifier Value
|
Process: identifying
|
Identified Token
|
the creator of meaning is decoded by reference to the meaning created, or
and
|
the Word
|
was
|
God
|
Identified Value
|
Process: identifying
|
Identifier Token
|
Alternatively, on an attributive reading (e.g. George was king):
and
|
the Word
|
was
|
God
|
Carrier
|
Process: attributive
|
Attribute
|
the meaning created is an instance of the creator of meaning (as meaning potential).
∞
From the perspective of Systemic Functional Linguistic theory, mythologies are sub-potentials of cultural semiotic systems that are realised in — and construed by — language in the first instance (followed by other semiotic systems made possible by language).
Mythologies are the oldest surviving reconstruals of experience, and were made possible by the stratification of the content plane of language into wording and meaning. Halliday & Matthiessen (2014: 25):
This stratification of the content plane had immense significance in the evolution of the human species — it is not an exaggeration to say that it turned Homo ... into Homo sapiens. It opened up the power of language and in so doing created the modern human brain.
And it was the stratification of content into wording and meaning that made metaphor possible. Where science uses grammatical metaphor to understand the environments in which humans must fit, mythology uses lexical metaphor to construe ways of fitting into physical and social environments.
No comments:
Post a Comment